MF4J Newsletter

Sign Up for the MF4J.org Newsletter






Home
Senator Greg Bell Addresses Non-Custodial Parents Print E-mail
Sunday, 05 August 2007
Utah State Senator Greg Bell addresses a group of concerned non-custodial parents on Thursday, August 2 at the Salt Lake City, County Library. In attendance were various persons representing fathers, mothers, grandparents, step-parents and interested groups. MF4J.org was joined by IAMNOTAVISITOR.org, ForgottenParent.org, Utah Fathers Rights Meetup and Shared Parenting.

Senator Bell fielded a number of questions and concerns ranging from issues related to mediation, child support, visitation and parent time.  Thanks go out to the many individuals and persons who made this possible. MF4J.org plans to aid in further discussions with other Utah legislators. (MF4J.org will post a summary of Senator Bell's answers and concerns as soon as video and audio have been reviewed.)

One of the most discussed issues at the meeting was 50/50 equal parenting legislation. Senator Bell explained the difficulties with jumping immediately to a 50/50 parenting presumption from the legislative and practical points of view and was open to looking further into 50/50 equal parenting based on research and studies.

Another of the obvious concerns to non-custodial parents that was brought up was child support. Concerned non-custodial parents contend that child support does not always go to the best interest of the child, but rather to support the custodial parent's interests. See this clip from the meeting with Senator Bell that clarifies that child support is a multi-million dollar interest for the state of Utah.  Halfway through the video see a child of divorce question the senator about accountability for the child support the custodial parent receives.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKvVF3gvyYU
(Recorded by IamNotaVisitor.org)

(Transcript below and commentary regarding ORS provided by Utah Fathers Rights Meetup Group)

Audience member: The best interests of the child is what I want to talk about. When we discuss this issue of 50/50 custody what often comes up is the economic situation for mothers. That's not talking about the best interests of the child then. You've switched from the best interests of the child now to the best interests of one parent. And what I would like to say about this is we really need to separate those two issues, because if it's truly in the best interests of the child having involvement from both parents, then why are we messing with that because we're concerned about economics for one parent?

Senator Bell: Well, you make a great point and if you and I were designing a new world that's where we would start. But we're not. We're stuck with a system and I'm just saying that there's no way you're going to lop off hundreds of millions of child support overnight or for even a three year ammortization. You know what I'm saying. It's a huge economic and social shift and you know whether you and I and all the angels agree or not we're not going to get the governor and 103 other people you know to move there overnight so ah you're right. The interests of the child is not necesarily found with the child support cause the child support may or may not go to the best interest of the children.

Another audience member: Senator Bell, I am one of those children. My parents divorced in Montana. And my dad currently lives here in Utah. It was a very unfair situation and I'd like to see something on the legislature that puts parents in responsibility to that child support. I'd like to see a program like Horizontee cards for welfare that maybe we keep track of that child support so that we know it's going for the children cause it's not parental support, it's child support. And my mom took the child support and didn't use it to support me. My mom never gave me a college fund. She never made sure I had the tools to be a successful adult. I escaped from my mother from a very abusive situation at the age of 17. My dad had to continue paying child support till I was 19. And I didn't live with my mom and I had no support from her. I would like to see something on the legislature that changes to where we do keep track of child support. My dad is currently $140,000... of what it goes towards, of what it's spent on. Because the price of raising a child is not dependent on a percentage of a wage, it is a price, but shouldn't we keep track of where that money goes so it's not used for mommy when the children are gone, for her and the new husband to go away to Hawaii. That's not a very useful use of that child support... and there's parents trading there child support for drugs and all sorts of ridiculous things.

Just how much money is this hundreds of millions in child support?? According to the website of the Utah Office of Recovery Services, over $195.9 million was collected in fiscal year 2006. Of this amount over $23.4 million was distributed to the Utah Department of Health (as apposed to being distributed to recipient parents), and at least $6.3 million made it directly into the state's general fund (as apposed to being distributed to recipient parents).

As a response to the above a member of Utah Fathers Rights Meetup submitted the following link to a video where a former worker for a state office of child support enforcement testifies as to the ulterior motives these offices have and employ.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M7cEi61W24
Next >
Advertisement
General Information
please call:
801-776-4766

Recommended Utah Fathers Rights Lawyers
TR Spencer & Associates
(www.trspencer.com)

Terry R. Spencer, Ph.D.
140 West  9000 South,  # 9
Sandy, Utah 84070
(801) 566-1884

Philip Reichenbach
preich12@hotmail.com
PO Box 377
Centerville, Utah 84014
(801) 255-2055


Find the right attorney for your needs.
a MUST use resource!

(highly recommended by MF4j.org members)

Who's Online

We have 20 guests online